FY2011 Plans of Japanese OEMs
Large-scale increase of production to start this autumn, while dollar-yen rate subject to second rev
2011/09/21
- Summary
- Big jolt over--Japanese OEMs back to normal in the summer and to increase production by 10 to 20% from the autumn
- Consolidated sales volume: FY2011 plan up by 4.5% to 21.477 million units, while 1Q down by 20.9% to 3.929 million units
- Revenues: Japanese OEMs plan increase by 0.7% to 46.8 trillion yen for FY2011 regardless of decrease by 20.5% to 9.3 trillion yen in the 1Q
- Profits: Ten OEMs' overall forecasts lower profit by 23.4% to 1.47 trillion yen for FY2011, at an assumed exchange rate of 80 yen to the US dollar
- Positive and negative effects on operating profits: losses from exchange fluctuation and increase in expenditures surpass increases in earnings and those from cost reduction
- OEMs plan to increase capital investment by 31%; R&D costs of more than two trillion yen for the first time in three years
Summary
Domestic production of Japanese OEMs stayed at about 40% of that of the previous year in March and April due to the Great East Japan Earthquake in March 2011. Fortunately, the production recovered in July to around 90% to the level of the previous year, which was boosted by the government eco-car subsidy. In short, their production capacities have come back to normal. The OEMs will increase production by 10 to 20% over the previous year starting this autumn.
OEMs' FY2011 business forecasts were unveiled one after another starting in the middle of June after the delays due to the earthquake. In the earnings announcements of the first quarter FY2011 (announced until early August), Toyota and Honda revised their business forecasts upward. Overall FY2011 business forecasts of ten Japanese OEMs are as follows: on a year-over-year basis, the sales volume will be up by 4.5% to 21.477 million units, revenues will be up by 0.7% to 46.8 trillion yen, operating profit will be down by 23.4% to 1.47 trillion yen, at an assumed exchange rate of 80 yen to the US dollar.
Unfortunately, the yen continued to rise after August and stayed at the upper 76 yen zone to the dollar. If the yen remains this high, each Japanese OEM will have to revise the assumed rate, which would erode their business results (Toyota revised the FY2011 initial assumption of exchange rate from 82 yen to 80 yen to the dollar in the first quarter earnings announcement).
Overviews of Japanese OEMs' FY2011 plans and 1Q business results
Four-wheeler sales volume (1,000 units) | Consolidated revenues (100 million yen) | Operating profit (100 million yen) | Yen to dollar (yen) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2010 business results | FY2011 | FY2010 business results | FY2011 | FY2010 business results | FY2011 | Full- year plan | First quarter results | ||||
Full- year plan | First quarter results | Full- year plan | First quarter results | Full- year plan | First quarter results | ||||||
Toyota | 7,308 | 7,600 | 1,221 | 189,937 | 190,000 | 34,410 | 4,682 | 4,500 | (1,080) | 80 | 82 |
Honda | 3,512 | 3,435 | 547 | 89,368 | 87,000 | 17,146 | 5,697 | 2,700 | 225 | 80 | 82 |
Nissan | 3,888 | 4,272 | 934 | 87,731 | 94,000 | 20,820 | 5,375 | 4,600 | 1,504 | 80 | 81.7 |
Suzuki | 2,642 | 2,819 | 594 | 26,082 | 26,100 | 6,073 | 1,069 | 1,100 | 256 | 80 | 82 |
Mazda | 1,100 | 1,127 | 186 | 23,257 | 21,900 | 4,081 | 238 | 200 | (231) | 83 | 82 |
Mitsubishi | 1,045 | 1,173 | 252 | 18,285 | 19,500 | 4,319 | 403 | 500 | 122 | 80 | 82 |
Daihatsu | 893 | 892 | 192 | 15,594 | 15,700 | 3,297 | 1,034 | 850 | 172 | 80 | 82 |
Fuji Heavy | 657 | 632 | 118 | 15,806 | 14,800 | 3,004 | 841 | 300 | 107 | 81 | 82 |
Isuzu | 408 | 419 | 77 | 14,155 | 14,800 | 2,844 | 882 | 800 | 144 | 80 | 82 |
Hino | 108 | 128 | 22 | 12,427 | 13,500 | 2,326 | 289 | 350 | 46 | 80 | |
Ten OEMs' total | 20,560 | 21,477 | 3,929 | 464,621 | 468,100 | 92,697 | 19,187 | 14,700 | 1,047 | 80 | 82 |
Source: OEMs' financial brief notes and earnings announcement documents | |
Notes 1. | The blanks signify a lack of data due to no announcement from each OEM. |
2. | The total of the yen-dollar exchange rates shows the average of the ten OEMs. |
Big jolt over--Japanese OEMs back to normal in the summer and to increase production by 10 to 20% from the autumn
As a consequence of the Great East Japan Earthquake in March 2011, Japanese OEMs had to suspend or reduce their production. Their production has been back to normal since this summer. Overall the domestic production volume of eight passenger car OEMs dropped to 42.5% in March and 39.9% in April of that of the previous year. It has gradually recovered to 68% in May and 84.8% in June. In July, the total production was back to 90.6% of the level for the same month last year. It is close to their normal production capacities, considering the increase in production last year when there was a rush demand before the expiration of the government eco-car subsidiary.
The overall accumulated production volume of eight OEMs was up to a total of 81.7% on a year-over-year basis in the period covering April to July 2011. The domestic production reached 72.2% and the overseas production 88.2% on a year-over-year basis. Some of the eight companies which announced their full-year production plan (fiscal year basis) set a production target at even or higher by 10% over the level of the previous year. They plan to increase production by 10% or 20% starting this autumn.
Total FY2011 production volume of eight passenger car OEMs |
(Unit in one - the lower shows the percentage on a year-to-year basis (%)) |
March (FYI) | April | May | June | July | Cumulative total in April - July period of |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Japan | Toyota | 129,491 | 53,823 | 107,437 | 249,660 | 262,328 | 673,248 |
37.3 | 21.6 | 45.6 | 84.1 | 87.5 | 62.3 | ||
Honda | 34,754 | 14,168 | 34,746 | 43,289 | 70,809 | 163,012 | |
37.1 | 19.0 | 46.6 | 49.4 | 81.5 | 50.4 | ||
Nissan | 47,590 | 44,193 | 80,036 | 102,390 | 111,790 | 338,409 | |
47.6 | 51.3 | 100.8 | 101.9 | 115.3 | 93.2 | ||
Suzuki | 41,790 | 58,398 | 64,848 | 75,475 | 88,457 | 287,178 | |
39.8 | 68.9 | 73.9 | 77.1 | 91.3 | 78.2 | ||
Mazda | 39,887 | 35,313 | 62,208 | 80,114 | 79,486 | 257,121 | |
46.4 | 50.3 | 88.2 | 97.7 | 95.0 | 83.9 | ||
Mitsubishi | 49,434 | 27,481 | 47,013 | 59,069 | 50,808 | 184,371 | |
74.3 | 68.3 | 107.7 | 108.1 | 79.9 | 91.2 | ||
Daihatsu | 28,091 | 20,578 | 41,893 | 59,389 | 52,937 | 174,797 | |
42.7 | 37.4 | 85.2 | 97.8 | 95.1 | 79.2 | ||
Fuji Heavy | 16,530 | 25,391 | 22,438 | 29,910 | 33,461 | 111,200 | |
35.1 | 62.4 | 60.6 | 67.7 | 75.8 | 67.0 | ||
Total | 387,567 | 279,345 | 460,619 | 699,296 | 750,076 | 2,189,336 | |
42.5 | 39.9 | 68.0 | 84.8 | 90.6 | 72.2 | ||
Overseas | Toyota | 412,974 | 254,732 | 180,374 | 344,179 | 332,286 | 1,111,571 |
96.9 | 74.5 | 54.2 | 96.4 | 99.5 | 81.4 | ||
Honda | 247,500 | 124,330 | 103,106 | 125,084 | 135,918 | 488,438 | |
96.8 | 56.5 | 50.6 | 57.9 | 59.6 | 56.3 | ||
Nissan | 335,114 | 203,831 | 288,878 | 317,441 | 276,890 | 1,087,040 | |
133.3 | 81.7 | 125.7 | 125.0 | 118.6 | 112.4 | ||
Suzuki | 187,583 | 162,434 | 159,591 | 121,703 | 139,690 | 583,418 | |
121.8 | 112.2 | 107.1 | 90.7 | 99.9 | 102.8 | ||
Mazda | 40,278 | 26,700 | 20,366 | 33,672 | 23,898 | 104,636 | |
114.5 | 107.1 | 76.6 | 101.2 | 68.5 | 87.4 | ||
Mitsubishi | 56,795 | 40,758 | 45,772 | 47,198 | 47,054 | 180,782 | |
107.9 | 102.6 | 115.1 | 125.3 | 119.8 | 115.6 | ||
Daihatsu | 14,751 | 11,452 | 15,104 | 15,640 | 18,761 | 60,957 | |
127.1 | 89.5 | 124.6 | 106.6 | 123.7 | 111.3 | ||
Fuji Heavy | 14,829 | 8,900 | 11,712 | 12,650 | 6,373 | 39,635 | |
106.9 | 67.5 | 175.3 | 63.0 | 83.1 | 83.2 | ||
Total | 1,309,824 | 833,137 | 824,903 | 1,017,567 | 980,870 | 3,656,477 | |
109.1 | 79.6 | 82.4 | 95.4 | 95.0 | 88.2 | ||
Total | Toyota | 542,465 | 308,555 | 287,811 | 593,839 | 594,614 | 1,784,819 |
70.1 | 52.2 | 50.7 | 90.8 | 93.9 | 73.0 | ||
Honda | 282,254 | 138,498 | 137,852 | 168,373 | 206,727 | 651,450 | |
80.8 | 47.1 | 49.6 | 55.5 | 65.6 | 54.7 | ||
Nissan | 382,704 | 248,024 | 368,914 | 419,831 | 388,680 | 1,425,449 | |
109.0 | 77.6 | 119.3 | 118.5 | 117.6 | 108.5 | ||
Suzuki | 229,373 | 220,832 | 224,439 | 197,178 | 228,147 | 870,596 | |
88.6 | 96.2 | 94.8 | 85 | 96.4 | 93.1 | ||
Mazda | 80,165 | 62,013 | 82,574 | 113,786 | 103,384 | 361,757 | |
66.2 | 65.1 | 85.0 | 98.7 | 87.2 | 84.9 | ||
Mitsubishi | 106,229 | 68,239 | 92,785 | 106,267 | 97,862 | 365,153 | |
89.1 | 85.4 | 111.2 | 115.1 | 95.1 | 101.8 | ||
Daihatsu | 42,842 | 32,030 | 56,997 | 75,029 | 71,698 | 235,754 | |
55.4 | 47.2 | 93.0 | 99.5 | 101.2 | 85.6 | ||
Fuji Heavy | 31,359 | 34,291 | 34,150 | 42,560 | 39,834 | 150,835 | |
51.4 | 63.7 | 78.1 | 66.2 | 76.8 | 70.6 | ||
Total | 1,697,391 | 1,112,482 | 1,285,522 | 1,716,863 | 1,730,946 | 5,845,813 | |
80.4 | 64.3 | 76.6 | 90.8 | 93.1 | 81.7 |
Source: The table compiled from OEMs' press releases
Total FY2011 production plans of eight passenger car OEMs |
(Unit in 10,000 - the lower shows the percentage on a year-to-year basis (%)) |
Japan | Overseas | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
Toyota | 314 | 458 | 772 |
104.5 | 105.5 | 105.1 | |
Honda | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
Nissan | 115.5 | 345.8 | 461.3 |
107.6 | 112.3 | 111.1 | |
Suzuki | 101 | 203 | 304 |
101.6 | 107.8 | 105.6 | |
Mazda | 90 | n.a. | n.a. |
103.8 | n.a. | n.a. | |
Mitsubishi | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
Daihatsu | 57.3 | 35.6 | 92.9 |
96.3 | 106.1 | 99.8 | |
Fuji Heavy | 46.3 | 16.7 | 63 |
100.9 | 101.5 | 101.1 |
Source: The table compiled from OEMs' press releases | |
NOTES: 1. | "Production records" and "production plans" are compiled from the data on the same basis; however, those data by Nissan and Daihatsu are compiled on a different basis as follows: |
2. | Nissan's Chinese/Taiwan data in the production plan are based on those in the January - December period, which is different from the period encompassing "production records." |
3. | Daihatsu's production records include those supplied under the OEM agreements, which are excluded from the "production plan." |
Consolidated sales volume: FY2011 plan up by 4.5% to 21.477 million units, while 1Q down by 20.9% to 3.929 million units
In FY2011, ten Japanese OEMs plan to sell 21.477 million units (consolidated sales volume basis), up by 4.5% over the previous year. Noteworthy is that Nissan plans to increase sales by 9.9% to 4.6 million units (global sales volume basis), in an attempt to have the second consecutive record sales volume since FY2010. Toyota and Honda revised their initial plans upward in the first quarter earnings announcements. Toyota initially planned to sell 7.240 million units in FY 2011-a decrease by 0.9% from previous year; however, they revised the plan upward to indicate an increase by 4.0% to 7.600 million units. Honda also initially planned to sell 3.300 million units in FY2011 down by 6.0% on a year-on-year basis; but they revised the plan upward to a decrease by 2.2% to 3.435 million units. In addition to the above OEMs' plans, Daihatsu and Fuji Heavy have a sales volume plan for FY 2011 that is lower than the FY 2010 level.
Overall, OEMs plan their FY2011 domestic sales volume of 4.312 million units, up by 1.9% over the previous year, when the auto industry was jolted by the expiration of government subsidiary for eco cars and the Great East Japan Earthquake. Three OEMs including Honda which had a great effect of the quake and two mini-car OEMs, namely Suzuki and Daihatsu, forecast a drop in their domestic sales volume. Ten OEMs plan to increase FY2011 overseas sales volume by 5.1% to 17.165 million units in total. Of them, Nissan and Suzuki plan to increase overseas sales by around 10%.
Consolidated sales volume in the first quarter of FY2011 was down by 20.9% to 3.929 million units from a total of ten OEMs. Their domestic sales volume was down by 31.6% to 732 K units. There was only a small decrease in the sales volumes of Nissan, Mitsubishi and Fuji Heavy Industries; this was because production at Nissan made a quick recovery, Mitsubishi has plants in western Japan, and Fuji Heavy increased the number of models to sell. Total overseas sales volume was down by 17.9% to 3.198 million units in total of the ten OEMs. Yet, Nissan, Mitsubishi and Suzuki recorded an increase in the overseas sales over the same period last year.
Ten Japanese OEMs' consolidated sales volume of four-wheelers |
(1,000 units) |
FY2007 | FY2008 | FY2009 | FY2010 | Initial FY2011 forecast | FY2011 forecast in the 1Q earnings announcement | First quarter | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2010 | FY2011 | ||||||||
Sales volume of four wheelers | Toyota | 8,913 | 7,567 | 7,237 | 7,308 | 7,240 | 7,600 | 1,820 | 1,221 |
Honda | 3,925 | 3,517 | 3,392 | 3,512 | 3,300 | 3,435 | 899 | 547 | |
Nissan | 3,698 | 3,138 | 3,159 | 3,888 | → | 4,272 | 874 | 934 | |
Suzuki | 2,406 | 2,306 | 2,350 | 2,642 | → | 2,819 | 611 | 594 | |
Mazda | 1,240 | 1,116 | 963 | 1,100 | → | 1,127 | 268 | 186 | |
Mitsubishi | 1,337 | 1,011 | 805 | 1,045 | → | 1,173 | 240 | 252 | |
Daihatsu | 945 | 945 | 869 | 893 | → | 892 | 228 | 192 | |
Fuji Heavy | 597 | 555 | 563 | 657 | 633 | 632 | 150 | 118 | |
Isuzu | 509 | 401 | 288 | 408 | → | 419 | 104 | 77 | |
Hino | 112 | 99 | 83 | 108 | → | 128 | 25 | 22 | |
Ten OEMs' total | 22,624 | 19,611 | 18,757 | 20,560 | 20.983 |
21,477 | 4,966 | 3,929 | |
Domestic sales volume | Toyota | 2,188 | 1,945 | 2,163 | 1,913 | 1,930 | 1,980 | 500 | 292 |
Honda | 615 | 556 | 646 | 582 | 565 | 565 | 145 | 91 | |
Nissan | 684 | 576 | 599 | 573 | → | 583 | 130 | 115 | |
Suzuki | 673 | 665 | 622 | 588 | → | 575 | 152 | 113 | |
Mazda | 257 | 220 | 219 | 206 | → | 207 | 54 | 43 | |
Mitsubishi | 214 | 164 | 170 | 166 | → | 189 | 43 | 39 | |
Daihatsu | 571 | 587 | 568 | 527 | → | 516 | 137 | 101 | |
Fuji Heavy | 209 | 179 | 171 | 158 | 164 | 35 | 31 | ||
Isuzu | 74 | 58 | 42 | 47 | → | 49 | 11 | 8 | |
Hino | 46 | 35 | 27 | 29 | → | 35 | 6 | 5 | |
Ten OEMs' total | 4,914 | 4,363 | 4,632 | 4,233 | 4,312 | 1,070 | 732 | ||
Overseas sales volume | Toyota | 6,725 | 5,622 | 5,074 | 5,395 | 5,310 | 5,620 | 1,320 | 929 |
Honda | 3,310 | 2,961 | 2,746 | 2,930 | 2,735 | 2,870 | 754 | 456 | |
Nissan | 3,013 | 2,562 | 2,560 | 3,315 | → | 3,689 | 744 | 819 | |
Suzuki | 1,732 | 1,641 | 1,729 | 2,053 | → | 2,244 | 458 | 481 | |
Mazda | 983 | 896 | 744 | 894 | → | 920 | 214 | 143 | |
Mitsubishi | 1,123 | 847 | 635 | 879 | → | 984 | 197 | 213 | |
Daihatsu | 374 | 358 | 301 | 366 | → | 376 | 92 | 91 | |
Fuji Heavy | 388 | 377 | 392 | 499 | 468 | 115 | 88 | ||
Isuzu | 435 | 343 | 246 | 361 | → | 370 | 93 | 69 | |
Hino | 66 | 64 | 56 | 79 | → | 93 | 19 | 17 | |
Ten OEMs' total | 17,709 | 15,248 | 14,126 | 16,326 | 17,165 | 3,895 | 3,198 |
Source: OEMs' financial brief notes and earnings announcement documents | |
NOTES: 1. | Daimler's subsidiary Mitsubishi Fuso and Volvo's subsidiary UD Trucks did not disclose the business results. |
2. | Toyota and Honda follow the US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Mitsubishi represents Mitsubishi Motors. The planned consolidated sales volumes reflect the announcements made by the respective OEMs. The arrow mark "→" represents that the initial full-year forecasts and those in the first quarter of FY2011 earnings announcement are the same. The blanks represent that each OEM did not announce the data (the same applicable to the tables below). |
3. | Ten OEMs' total does not include the consolidated data of Daihatsu and Hino to avoid overlaps with Toyota (the same applicable to the tables below). |
4. | Some consolidated sales volume data include components for production. |
5. | The FY2011 plans of Nissan and Mazda are reference values calculated by adding to the FY2010 records an increase or decrease in the announced global sales volume plans. The global sales volumes are based on a retail basis, which include components for production and assembled vehicles at their equity method foreign affiliates. |
6. | Suzuki's sales volume shows the number of Suzuki brand vehicles excluding those supplied under OEM agreement. Nevertheless, its domestic sales volume includes the Chevrolet brand vehicles. The FY2010 overseas sales include some estimated values by Suzuki. |
7. | The FY2010 data of Mazda include 16K units arising from the 15-month business term of its overseas subsidiaries which changed the account settlement period. |
8. | Mitsubishi Motors has revised the method to count sold vehicles since FY 2011. The newly counted (wholesale) sales volume includes those supplied under OEM agreement. The sales volume was 228K units in the first quarter of FY2010 according to the old counting method, while it was 240K units according to the new method. |
9. | Daihatsu and Hino show the sales volumes of their own brand vehicles (Toyota's sales volume includes those of Daihatsu and Hino). |
10. | Isuzu's FY2007 data include the 15-month results of its eight overseas consolidated subsidiaries (the overseas sales volume was 385K units on a 12-month basis). |
Revenues: Japanese OEMs plan increase by 0.7% to 46.8 trillion yen for FY2011 regardless of decrease by 20.5% to 9.3 trillion yen in the 1Q
Ten Japanese OEMs plan FY2011 consolidated revenues of 46.8 trillion yen in total. Specifically, Nissan plans an increase in consolidated revenues by 7.1% to 9.4 trillion yen. If Nissan achieves the planned figure, Nissan will surpass Honda on revenues due to the projected revenue for Honda in the same period being 8.7 trillion yen (down by 2.6%). Mazda and Fuji Heavy Industries expect to have a decrease in revenues by 5.8% and 6.4%, respectively.
The total revenues of ten OEMs were down by 20.5% to 9.3 trillion yen in the first quarter of FY2011. A revenue drop of more than 20% was recorded due to the earthquake, while Nissan and Mitsubishi recorded an increase in sales volume and in revenues by 1.6% and 7.0%, respectively. In contrast, Toyota, Honda and Mazda recorded a decrease in earnings by approximately 30%.
Ten Japanese OEMs' consolidated revenues |
(Yen in 100 million) |
FY2007 | FY2008 | FY2009 | FY2010 | Initial FY2011 forecast | FY2011 forecast in the 1Q earnings announcement | First quarter | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2010 | FY2011 | ||||||||
Revenues | Toyota | 262,892 | 205,296 | 189,509 | 189,937 | 186,000 | 190,000 | 48,718 | 34,410 |
Honda | 120,028 | 100,112 | 85,792 | 89,368 | 83,000 | 87,000 | 23,615 | 17,146 | |
Nissan | 108,242 | 84,370 | 75,173 | 87,731 | → | 94,000 | 20,501 | 20,820 | |
Suzuki | 35,024 | 30,049 | 24,691 | 26,082 | → | 26,100 | 6,563 | 6,073 | |
Mazda | 34,758 | 25,359 | 21,639 | 23,257 | → | 21,900 | 5,780 | 4,081 | |
Mitsubishi | 26,821 | 19,736 | 14,456 | 18,285 | → | 19,500 | 4,037 | 4,319 | |
Daihatsu | 17,026 | 16,314 | 15,747 | 15,594 | → | 15,700 | 4,114 | 3,297 | |
Fuji Heavy | 15,723 | 14,458 | 14,287 | 15,806 | → | 14,800 | 3,703 | 3,004 | |
Isuzu | 19,248 | 14,247 | 10,809 | 14,155 | → | 14,800 | 3,663 | 2,844 | |
Hino | 13,686 | 10,695 | 10,235 | 12,427 | → | 13,500 | 2,945 | 2,326 | |
Ten OEMs' total | 622,738 | 493,626 | 436,356 | 464,621 | 460,100 |
468,100 | 116,580 | 92,697 | |
Domestic revenues | Toyota | 61,362 | 54,218 | 57,291 | 53,250 | ||||
Honda | 15,858 | 14,465 | 15,773 | 15,038 | 3,703 | 2,804 | |||
Nissan | 21,878 | 20,383 | 18,032 | 18,694 | 4,161 | 3,967 | |||
Suzuki | 9,814 | 9,656 | 9,526 | 9,374 | → | 9,400 | 2,386 | 2,016 | |
Mazda | 8,801 | 6,203 | 5,750 | 5,415 | → | 5,800 | 1,365 | 1,160 | |
Mitsubishi | 4,885 | 3,984 | 3,685 | 3,633 | 824 | 761 | |||
Daihatsu | 11,771 | 11,913 | 11,296 | 10,567 | → | 10,500 | 2,739 | 2,037 | |
Fuji Heavy | 5,440 | 5,075 | 5,208 | 4,673 | 4,500 | 1,045 | 988 | ||
Isuzu | 6,547 | 5,338 | 4,330 | 4,986 | → | 5,100 | 1,182 | 974 | |
Hino | 9,246 | 6,944 | 6,754 | 8,455 | |||||
Ten OEMs' total | 134,586 | 119,322 | 119,595 | 115,063 | 24,800 | 14,666 | 12,670 | ||
Overseas revenues | Toyota | 201,530 | 151,078 | 132,218 | 136,687 | ||||
Honda | 104,171 | 85,647 | 70,019 | 74,330 | 19,912 | 14,342 | |||
Nissan | 86,364 | 63,987 | 57,141 | 69,037 | 16,340 | 16,853 | |||
Suzuki | 25,210 | 20,393 | 15,165 | 16,708 | → | 16,700 | 4,177 | 4,057 | |
Mazda | 25,957 | 19,156 | 15,889 | 17,842 | → | 16,100 | 4,415 | 2,921 | |
Mitsubishi | 21,936 | 15,752 | 10,771 | 14,652 | 3,213 | 3,558 | |||
Daihatsu | 5,255 | 4,401 | 4,452 | 5,027 | → | 5,200 | 1,375 | 1,261 | |
Fuji Heavy | 10,284 | 9,383 | 9,079 | 11,132 | 10,300 | 2,658 | 2,016 | ||
Isuzu | 12,701 | 8,909 | 6,479 | 9,169 | → | 9,700 | 2,481 | 1,870 | |
Hino | 4,440 | 3,751 | 3,481 | 3,972 | |||||
Ten OEMs' total | 488,153 | 374,304 | 316,761 | 349,557 | 52,800 | 53,195 | 45,617 |
Source: OEMs' financial brief notes and earnings announcement documents
NOTE: Domestic/overseas earnings represent earnings by location of external customers.
Profits: Ten OEMs' overall forecasts lower profit by 23.4% to 1.47 trillion yen for FY2011, at an assumed exchange rate of 80 yen to the US dollar
For the FY 2011, most Japanese OEMs' plans lower profits on a year-on-year basis. Ten OEMs projected a fall in operating profit by 23.4% to 1.47 trillion yen, in current profit by 28.2% to 1.51 trillion yen, and in net profit by 22.2% to 1.06 trillion yen. Honda, in particular, forecasts a nose-dive in three profit items by more than 50%. On the other hand, Suzuki, Mitsubishi and Hino project an increase in all profit items. Mazda has also forecasted a positive net profit for the first time in four years.
In the first quarter of FY2011, Japanese OEMs had a significant drop in profits except Mitsubishi. Toyota recorded a negative operating profit of 108.0 billion yen and a negative pretax profit of 80.5 billion yen (the net profit was a positive 1.1 billion yen). Mazda recorded in the negative for three profit items.
Most Japanese OEMs assumed the exchange rate of 80 yen to the US dollar for FY2011 at the first quarter earnings announcement, while Mazda assumed 83 yen and Fuji Heavy 81 yen to the dollar. Toyota assumed the rate of 82 yen to the US dollar in the announcement of the initial full-year business forecast as of June 10, 2011, when the exchange rate hovered at the low level of 80 yen to the dollar. However, the yen rose further than expected to the high 70 yen zone after the middle of July. Toyota, therefore, raised their calculated rate to 80 yen to the dollar in the earnings announcement of the first quarter (August 2). The exchange rate hovered mostly at the upper 76 yen range to the dollar during August.
Ten Japanese OEMs' consolidated operating profits/current profits/net profits |
(Yen in 100 million) |
FY2007 | FY2008 | FY2009 | FY2010 | Initial FY2011 forecast | FY2011 forecast in the 1Q earnings announcement | First quarter | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2010 | FY2011 | ||||||||
Operating profit | Toyota | 22,704 | (4,610) | 1,475 | 4,682 | 3,000 | 4,500 | 2,116 | (1,080) |
Honda | 9,531 | 1,896 | 3,637 | 5,697 | 2,000 | 2,700 | 2,344 | 225 | |
Nissan | 7,908 | (1,379) | 3,116 | 5,375 | → | 4,600 | 1,679 | 1,504 | |
Suzuki | 1,494 | 769 | 794 | 1,069 | → | 1,100 | 319 | 256 | |
Mazda | 1,621 | (284) | 95 | 238 | → | 200 | 64 | (231) | |
Mitsubishi | 1,086 | 39 | 139 | 403 | → | 500 | (45) | 122 | |
Daihatsu | 652 | 382 | 407 | 1,034 | → | 850 | 347 | 172 | |
Fuji Heavy | 457 | (58) | 274 | 841 | → | 300 | 226 | 107 | |
Isuzu | 1,096 | 217 | 110 | 882 | → | 800 | 238 | 144 | |
Hino | 459 | (194) | 11 | 289 | → | 350 | 87 | 46 | |
Ten OEMs' total | 45,897 | (3,410) | 9,640 | 19,187 | 12,500 |
14,700 | 6,941 | 1,047 | |
Current profit | Toyota | 24,372 | (5,604) | 2,914 | 5,632 | 3,200 | 5,000 | 2,630 | (805) |
Honda | 8,958 | 1,617 | 3,361 | 6,305 | 2,150 | 2,850 | 2,561 | 292 | |
Nissan | 7,664 | (1,727) | 2,077 | 5,378 | → | 4,410 | 1,550 | 1,477 | |
Suzuki | 1,569 | 797 | 938 | 1,225 | → | 1,250 | 306 | 288 | |
Mazda | 1,485 | (187) | 46 | 369 | → | 150 | 41 | (258) | |
Mitsubishi | 857 | (149) | 130 | 389 | → | 400 | (58) | 103 | |
Daihatsu | 666 | 395 | 438 | 1,122 | → | 920 | 364 | 201 | |
Fuji Heavy | 454 | (46) | 224 | 822 | → | 250 | 242 | 117 | |
Isuzu | 1,223 | 152 | 114 | 913 | → | 800 | 231 | 144 | |
Hino | 410 | (304) | (19) | 251 | → | 310 | 71 | 38 | |
Ten OEMs' total | 46,583 | (5,147) | 9,804 | 21,033 | 12,610 |
15,110 | 7,503 | 1,358 | |
Net profit | Toyota | 17,179 | (4,369) | 2,094 | 4,081 | 2,800 | 3,900 | 1,904 | 11 |
Honda | 6,000 | 1,370 | 2,684 | 5,340 | 1,950 | 2,300 | 2,724 | 317 | |
Nissan | 4,823 | (2,337) | 424 | 3,192 | → | 2,700 | 1,066 | 850 | |
Suzuki | 803 | 274 | 289 | 452 | → | 500 | 152 | 187 | |
Mazda | 918 | (715) | (65) | (600) | → | 10 | (21) | (255) | |
Mitsubishi | 347 | (549) | 48 | 156 | → | 200 | (118) | 43 | |
Daihatsu | 349 | 221 | 212 | 526 | → | 370 | 199 | 68 | |
Fuji Heavy | 185 | (699) | (165) | 503 | → | 350 | 191 | 285 | |
Isuzu | 760 | (269) | 84 | 516 | → | 650 | 124 | 87 | |
Hino | 222 | (618) | (30) | (100) | → | 120 | 31 | (49) | |
Ten OEMs' total | 31,015 | (7,294) | 5,393 | 13,640 | 9,160 |
10,610 | 6,022 | 1,525 |
Source: OEMs' financial flash reports and earnings announcement documents | |
NOTES: 1. | The Current Profit data of Toyota and Honda shows respective pre-tax current profits as they adopt the US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. |
2. | Toyota posted an operating profit of 578.2 billion yen without the impact from the earthquake for the year ended in March 2011. It estimated the negative impact on operating profit from the Great East Japan Earthquake as negative 110 billion yen. Thus, it recorded the operating profit as 468.2 billion yen for the full year ended March 2011. |
3. | Honda posted the loss from the great earthquake as 45.72 billion yen, of which 17.45 billion yen was allocated to the sales cost and 28.27 billion yen to sales and general administration costs in the FY2010 consolidated business results. |
4. | As a natural disaster loss, Nissan posted 39.605 billion yen for an extraordinary loss in the FY2010 business results, and 21.13 billion yen in the first quarter FY2011 business results, respectively. |
5. | Suzuki posted earthquake damage of about 5 billion yen including damaged vehicles in the earthquake as a non-operating expenditure in the FY2010 business results. |
6. | Mazda posted extraordinary losses of 8.5 billion yen as a loss provision for the North American business and 5.2 billion yen for the earthquake impact. In addition, considering the drop in the FY2011 profit from the initially planned level due to the earthquake, Mazda reduced a part of deferred tax assets by about 56.7 billion yen, and posted it as effects on income taxes. In the first quarter FY2011, a loss of 3.653 billion yen was posted for an extraordinary loss as a natural disaster loss. |
7. | As a natural disaster loss, Mitsubishi posted 2.365 billion yen for the damage from the earthquake in the FY2010 results and 6.1 billion yen in the first quarter of FY2011. |
8. | As a natural disaster loss, Daihatsu posted 5.017 billion yen for an extraordinary loss in the FY2010 business results and 2.025 billion yen in the first quarter FY2011 business results. |
9. | As a natural disaster loss, Fuji Heavy posted 7.4 billion yen for an extraordinary loss in FY 2010 and 5.7 billion yen in the first quarter FY2011. On the other hand, it posted 26.1 billion yen earned from selling its headquarter building and the site as an extraordinary profit in the first quarter of FY2011. |
10. | Isuzu posted 9.03 billion yen in FY2010 and 560 million yen in the first quarter of FY2011 for earthquake losses respectively as an extraordinary loss. |
11. | As a natural disaster loss, Hino posted 6.15 billion yen in the FY2010 business results for an extraordinary loss, and 6.1 billion yen in the first quarter of FY2011. |
Assumed exchange rate of yen to dollar by ten Japanese OEMs |
(Yen) |
FY2007 | FY2008 | FY2009 | FY2010 | Initial FY2011 forecast | FY2011 forecast in the 1Q earnings announcement | First quarter | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2010 | FY2011 | ||||||||
Dollar | Toyota | 114 | 101 | 93 | 86 | 82 | 80 | 92 | 82 |
Honda | 114 | 101 | 93 | 86 | → | 80 | 92 | 82 | |
Nissan | 114.4 | 100.7 | 92.9 | 85.7 | → | 80.0 | 92.0 | 81.7 | |
Suzuki | 114 | 101 | 93 | 86 | → | 80 | 92 | 82 | |
Mazda | 114 | 101 | 93 | 86 | → | 83 | 92 | 82 | |
Mitsubishi | 115 | 101 | 92 | 85 | → | 80 | 93 | 82 | |
Daihatsu | 114 | 101 | 92 | 85 | → | 80 | 91 | 82 | |
Fuji Heavy | 116 | 102 | 93 | 86 | → | 81 | 92 | 82 | |
Isuzu | 115 | 101 | 91 | 85 | → | 80 | 93 | 82 | |
Hino | 114 | 101 | 93 | 86 | → | 80 | |||
Average | 114.4 | 101.1 | 92.6 | 85.7 | 80.6 |
80.4 | 92.1 | 82.0 | |
Euro | Toyota | 162 | 144 | 131 | 113 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 117 |
Honda | 162 | 142 | 130 | 114 | 110 | 112 | 118 | 118 | |
Nissan | 161.6 | 144.1 | 131.2 | 113.1 | → | 115.0 | 117.0 | 117.4 | |
Suzuki | 160 | 144 | 131 | 113 | → | 110 | 118 | 117 | |
Mazda | 162 | 144 | 131 | 113 | → | 113 | 117 | 117 | |
Mitsubishi | 162 | 144 | 130 | 113 | → | 115 | 119 | 118 | |
Daihatsu | 161 | 152 | 131 | 110 | → | 110 | 115 | 117 | |
Fuji Heavy | 147 | 132 | 114 | → | 115 | 121 | 117 | ||
Isuzu | |||||||||
Hino | |||||||||
Average | 161.5 | 145.1 | 130.9 | 112.9 | 113.3 | 117.8 | 117.3 |
NOTE: If OEMs announced a number of assumed exchange rates, their respective exchange rates used for sales are included in the table above.
Positive and negative effects on operating profits: losses from exchange fluctuation and increase in expenditures surpass increases in earnings and those from cost reduction
Ten OEMs' forecasts of their respective FY2011 operating profits and their FY2010 records caused a difference of negative 448.7 billion yen. Positive effects on the profits are 228.9 billion yen from a fluctuation in sales and 152.7 billion yen from cost reduction. Dampers for the operating profits are 430.8 billion yen from exchange fluctuation and 330.1 billion yen increases in overhead, R&D costs, etc.
Factors to cause increase/decrease in operating profits of Japanese OEMs |
(Yen in 100 million) |
FY2007 | FY2008 | FY2009 | FY2010 | Initial FY2011 forecast | FY2011 forecast in the 1Q earnings announce- ment | First quarter |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2011 | ||||||||
Toyota | Operating profit | 22,704 | (4,610) | 1,475 | 4,682 | 3,000 | 4,500 | (1,080) |
Increase/decrease in operating profits | 317 | (27,314) | 6,085 | 3,207 | (1,682) | (182) | (3,196) | |
Operation/sales | 2,900 | (14,800) | (3,700) | 4,900 | (500) | 1,300 | (2,800) | |
Cost improvements | 1,200 | 0 | 5,200 | 1,800 | 1,000 | 1,200 | 200 | |
Financial business | 2,700 | (700) | (500) | |||||
Impact from exchange fluctuation | 0 | (7,600) | (3,200) | (2,900) | (1,000) | (1,600) | (500) | |
Miscellaneous expenditures | (3,302) | (4,791) | 4,700 | (300) | (482) | (582) | 100 | |
(thereof:) R&D cost | (681) | 548 | 1,787 | (250) | (50) | |||
(thereof:) Facility cost | (997) | (904) | 378 | 1,200 | 200 | |||
(thereof:) Labor cost | (602) | 1,088 | 627 | (400) | (500) | |||
(thereof:) Others | (1,022) | (5,523) | 1,908 | (850) | 450 | |||
Others | (481) | (122) | 385 | (293) | (196) | |||
Honda | Operating profit | 9,531 | 1,896 | 3,637 | 5,697 | 2,000 | 2,700 | 225 |
Increase/decrease in operating profits | 1,012 | (7,634) | 1,741 | 2,060 | (3,697) | (2,997) | (2,118) | |
Difference from sales fluctuation/ mix | 1,700 | (2,477) | (2,465) | 3,222 | (1,192) | (872) | (1,348) | |
Impact from exchange fluctuation | 376 | (2,695) | (1,675) | (1,376) | (910) | (710) | (225) | |
Effects of cost reduction etc. | 115 | (1,825) | 674 | 1,533 | (710) | (590) | (831) | |
R&D cost | (361) | 247 | 998 | (242) | (675) | (675) | 80 | |
Sales administration cost | (818) | (883) | 4,209 | (620) | (210) | (150) | 205 | |
Impact from the earthquake | (457) | |||||||
Nissan (Note 2) | Operating profit | 7,908 | (1,379) | 3,116 | 5,375 | → | 4,600 | 1,504 |
Increase/decrease in operating profits | 353 | (9,287) | 4,495 | 2,259 | → | (775) | (175) | |
Impact from exchange fluctuation | (162) | (2,230) | (1,625) | (1,475) | (1,350) | (550) | ||
Sales volume/mix | 750 | (5,252) | 269 | 4,331 | 1,900 | 20 | ||
Sales cost, etc. | 882 | (1,342) | 2,154 | 1,058 | 450 | 126 | ||
Sales finance | 295 | 136 | ||||||
Reserve for loss of leasing | (918) | 1,417 | ||||||
R&D cost | (15) | 645 | (185) | (620) | 15 | |||
Sales cost | (381) | 271 | (1,915) | (1,120) | 78 | |||
Others | (721) | 455 | 1,364 | 150 | (35) | |||
Suzuki | Operating profit | 1,494 | 769 | 794 | 1,069 | → | 1,100 | 256 |
Increase/decrease in operating profits | 165 | (725) | 25 | 275 | → | 31 | (63) | |
Fluctuation in sales/mix, etc. | 408 | (1,422) | (696) | 253 | (89) | (125) | ||
Impact from exchange fluctuation | 225 | (707) | (469) | (283) | (280) | (59) | ||
Cost reduction | 284 | 201 | 172 | 355 | 280 | 13 | ||
Depreciation | (117) | 204 | (6) | 34 | 180 | 55 | ||
R&D cost | (166) | (63) | 62 | 47 | (60) | (2) | ||
Miscellaneous expenditures | (469) | 1,062 | 962 | (131) | 55 | |||
Mazda | Operating profit | 1,621 | (284) | 95 | 238 | → | 200 | (231) |
Increase/decrease in operating profits | 36 | (1,905) | 379 | 143 | → | (38) | (295) | |
Volume/vehicle type mix | 80 | (865) | (606) | 357 | (142) | (317) | ||
Impact from exchange fluctuation | 234 | (1,020) | (765) | (437) | (36) | (31) | ||
Improving product appeal | (133) | (190) | ||||||
Cost reduction | 158 | 440 | 680 | 112 | 126 | (4) | ||
Raw material market conditions | (440) | |||||||
For sales costs | (42) | 65 | 227 | (56) | (50) | 7 | ||
Others | (261) | 105 | 843 | 167 | 64 | 50 | ||
Mitsubishi | Operating profit | 1,086 | 39 | 139 | 403 | 500 | 122 | |
Increase/decrease in operating profits | 684 | (1,047) | 100 | 264 | 97 | 167 | ||
Volume/vehicle type mix | 543 | (720) | (856) | 533 | 260 | 182 | ||
Impact from exchange fluctuation | 146 | (761) | (418) | (342) | (90) | (35) | ||
Cost reduction etc. | 154 | 365 | 544 | 211 | 220 | 30 | ||
Impact from rising raw materials costs | (317) | |||||||
Others | 335 | 578 | (86) | (263) | (24) | |||
For sales cost | (64) | 174 | 252 | (51) | (30) | 14 | ||
US sales finance business | (95) | (123) | ||||||
Daihatsu | Operating profit | 652 | 381 | 407 | 1,034 | → | 172 | 850 |
Increase/decrease in operating profits | 109 | (271) | 26 | 627 | → | (175) | (184) | |
Sales/vehicle type mix | 190 | 113 | (258) | 224 | (191) | (40) | ||
Impact from exchange fluctuation | 39 | (80) | (79) | (17) | (4) | (9) | ||
Cost reduction | 106 | 105 | 123 | 150 | 22 | 80 | ||
Quality improvement cost | (7) | |||||||
Sales related costs | (37) | 29 | 79 | |||||
Miscellaneous expenditures | (227) | (408) | 239 | 313 | (30) | (294) | ||
Fuji Heavy | Operating profit | 457 | (58) | 274 | 841 | 300 | 107 | |
Increase/decrease in operating profits | (22) | (515) | 332 | 567 | (541) | (120) | ||
Sales mix disparity | (8) | 3 | 87 | 831 | (188) | (190) | ||
Impact from exchange fluctuation | 10 | (435) | (304) | (356) | (220) | (83) | ||
Cost reduction, etc. | 70 | (32) | 260 | 89 | (119) | (2) | ||
Testing and research costs | (13) | 92 | 57 | (57) | (51) | (17) | ||
Miscellaneous expenditures | (81) | (143) | 232 | 61 | 37 | 172 | ||
Isuzu | Operating profit | 1,096 | 217 | 110 | 882 | → | 800 | 144 |
Increase/decrease in operating profits | 26 | (879) | (107) | 772 | → | (82) | (94) | |
Change in sales/difference in product mix | (113) | (800) | (807) | 705 | 120 | (123) | ||
Impact from exchange fluctuation | 34 | (156) | (23) | (24) | (22) | (15) | ||
Changes in economic conditions | (82) | (273) | 181 | (98) | (140) | (6) | ||
Streamlining | 172 | 190 | 130 | 177 | 80 | 12 | ||
Compressing costs etc. | 412 | 12 | (120) | 38 | ||||
Improvement of profitability etc. | 76 | 344 | ||||||
Costs for facilities, R&D | (137) | (108) | ||||||
Changed accounting period of subsidiaries | 76 | (76) | ||||||
Hino | Operating profit | 459 | (194) | 11 | 289 | → | 350 | 46 |
Increase/decrease in operating profits | 92 | (653) | 205 | 278 | → | 61 | (41) | |
Impact on sales | 82 | (330) | 231 | 337 | 320 | (78) | ||
Changes in business climate | (36) | (366) | (70) | (111) | (260) | (41) | ||
Improvement of costs | 190 | 163 | 199 | 187 | 200 | 22 | ||
Changes in costs | (144) | (120) | 190 | (135) | (199) | 56 | ||
Fluctuation in sales volume | (345) | |||||||
Ten OEMs' total | Operating profit | 45,897 | (3,410) | 9,640 | 19,187 | 14,700 | 1,047 | |
Increase/decrease in operating profits | 2,571 | (49,306) | 13,050 | 9,547 | (4,487) | (5,894) | ||
Changes in sales | 6,260 | (26,333) | (8,774) | 15,132 | 2,289 | (4,701) | ||
Impact from exchange fluctuation | 863 | (15,604) | (8,479) | (7,193) | (4,308) | (1,498) | ||
Cost reduction etc. | 3,111 | (2,416) | 10,226 | 5,347 | 1,527 | (418) | ||
Overhead, R&D costs, etc. | (5,849) | (4,348) | 12,615 | (3,449) | (3,301) | 707 | ||
Others | (1,814) | (605) | 7,462 | (290) | (694) | 16 |
Source: OEMs' financial flash reports and earnings announcement documents | |
NOTES: 1. | The current profit data of Toyota and Honda represent pre-tax current profits as they adopt the US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. |
2. | Purchase costs etc. of Nissan include costs for raw materials and energy. |
3. | Suzuki's fluctuation in sales/mix include influence from raw materials cost. |
4. | Decrease in Mitsubishi's Miscellaneous expenditures includes depreciation. |
5. | Fuji Heavy's cost reduction etc. includes influences from rising raw material costs. |
OEMs plan to increase capital investment by 31%; R&D costs of more than two trillion yen for the first time in three years
The FY2011 capital investment plans of ten OEMs will be up by 31.3% over the previous year to 2.056 trillion yen in total, which will be a two-year increase in the capital investment. Ten OEMs project a depreciation of 1.426 trillion yen in total. The capital investment will exceed the depreciation for the first time in three years. Plans for R&D costs will be increased by 9.7% to 2.153 trillion yen. It is likely to exceed two trillion yen for the first time in three years.
Ten Japanese OEMs' consolidated capital investment, depreciation and R&D costs |
(Yen in 100 million) |
FY2007 | FY2008 | FY2009 | FY2010 | Initial FY2011 forecast | FY2011 forecast in the 1Q earnings announcement | First quarter | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2010 | FY2011 | ||||||||
Capital investment | Toyota | 14,802 | 13,025 | 5,790 | 6,423 | → | 7,200 | 926 | 1,164 |
Honda | 6,540 | 5,991 | 3,297 | 3,113 | → | 4,300 | 428 | 593 | |
Nissan | 4,289 | 3,836 | 2,736 | 3,120 | → | 4,100 | 426 | 389 | |
Suzuki | 2,436 | 2,162 | 1,312 | 1,303 | → | 2,100 | 397 | 327 | |
Mazda | 755 | 818 | 298 | 447 | → | 800 | 64 | 155 | |
Mitsubishi | 567 | 719 | 471 | 525 | → | 990 | 73 | 84 | |
Daihatsu | 1,117 | 767 | 367 | 406 | → | 650 | 60 | 71 | |
Fuji Heavy | 563 | 580 | 561 | 431 | → | 600 | 82 | 140 | |
Isuzu | 506 | 667 | 257 | 294 | → | 470 | 84 | 66 | |
Hino | 437 | 584 | 285 | 300 | → | 600 | |||
Ten OEMs' total | 30,458 | 27,798 | 14,722 | 15,656 | 20,560 | ||||
Depreciation cost | Toyota | 10,424 | 10,721 | 10,320 | 8,123 | → | 7,600 | 1,975 | 1,689 |
Honda | 4,173 | 4,082 | 3,666 | 3,252 | → | 3,150 | 825 | 713 | |
Nissan | 3,709 | 4,212 | 3,633 | 3,721 | 894 | 932 | |||
Suzuki | 1,616 | 1,412 | 1,418 | 1,384 | → | 1,200 | 305 | 250 | |
Mazda | 665 | 752 | 764 | 716 | → | 700 | 182 | 174 | |
Mitsubishi | 719 | 790 | 690 | 627 | → | 670 | 158 | 137 | |
Daihatsu | 665 | 837 | 729 | 637 | → | 570 | 151 | 141 | |
Fuji Heavy | 655 | 651 | 571 | 498 | → | 550 | 116 | 116 | |
Isuzu | 415 | 396 | 395 | 364 | → | 390 | 92 | 91 | |
Hino | 442 | 475 | 452 | 457 | → | 470 | |||
Ten OEMs' total | 22,376 | 23,016 | 21,457 | 18,685 | |||||
R&D cost | Toyota | 9,588 | 9,040 | 7,253 | 7,303 | → | 7,600 | 1,829 | 1,865 |
Honda | 5,879 | 5,631 | 4,633 | 4,875 | → | 5,550 | 1,182 | 1,102 | |
Nissan | 4,575 | 4,555 | 3,855 | 3,993 | → | 4,600 | 889 | 865 | |
Suzuki | 1,087 | 1,150 | 1,088 | 1,041 | → | 1,100 | 218 | 220 | |
Mazda | 1,144 | 960 | 852 | 910 | → | 950 | 232 | 252 | |
Mitsubishi | 776 | 640 | 444 | 494 | → | 640 | 119 | 133 | |
Daihatsu | 442 | 442 | 437 | 382 | → | 400 | 99 | 81 | |
Fuji Heavy | 520 | 428 | 372 | 429 | → | 480 | 89 | 160 | |
Isuzu | 603 | 677 | 552 | 586 | → | 610 | 131 | 134 | |
Hino | 395 | 409 | 381 | 411 | → | 415 | |||
Ten OEMs' total | 24,172 | 23,081 | 19,049 | 19,631 | 21,530 |
Source: OEMs' financial flash reports and earnings announcement documents
NOTE: Nissan's capital investment and depreciation have included the figures related to the Finance Lease since FY2008 (those until FY2007 were not included). The FY2007 investment is 516.4 billion yen according to the same FY2008 standards.
<全球汽车产业平台 MarkLines>