|
Index
Consolidated sales
volume in FY2009 drops by 4.4% while plans for FY2010 anticipate an...
Consolidated sales amount in FY2009 drops to 43.6 trillion JPY with decreased sales overseas
In FY2009, all 10 companies register operating profit and
in FY2010 also forecast ordinary...
Reduction of overhead cost, and R&D cost increased profit by 2.2 trillion JPY in FY2009
10 OEMs plan to increase investment by 400 billion JPY
and R & D by 150 billion JPY in FY2010
Executive Summary
The business results of Japanese
OEMs (10 companies' account settlements except Mitsubishi Fuso and UD
Trucks [former Nissan Diesel Motor]) for the FY2009 (ending March 2010)
ended in a consolidated sales volume of 18.756 million (down 4.4%).
Yet, among them, three OEMs - Nissan, Suzuki, and Fuji Heavy Industries
- boosted their sales. The 10 companies' consolidated sales amount was
43.6 trillion JPY, down by 5.7 trillion JPY (or 11.6%). The FY2009 results
were at a 70% level of that of FY2007. However, all companies posted
operating profits through the reduction of overhead cost etc.
The 10 makers' plan for FY2010
anticipates that the sales volume will increase to 19.949 million vehicles,
up 6.4%, due mainly to increases in sales overseas. The sales amount
is to grow by 2.6 trillion JPY (or up 5.9%) to 46.2 trillion JPY. All
companies expect to register an operating profit, ordinary profit, and
net profit.
Consolidated sales volume
in FY2009 drops by 4.4% while plans for FY2010 anticipate an increase
to 19.949 million, or up 6.4%
The consolidated vehicle sales volume of 10 Japanese automobile manufacturers in FY2009 accounted for only 18.756 million, down 4.4% compared to FY2008. However, while all companies showed decreased sales volume in FY2008 from FY2007, three companies - Nissan, Suzuki, and Fuji Heavy Industries - increased their sales in FY2009. This was due to an increase in vehicles sales by Suzuki and Fuji Heavy Industries mainly overseas, with Nissan decreasing slightly.
In Japan, due partly to the government's measures to encourage consumers to buy eco-friendly vehicles, the 10 companies boosted their consolidated vehicle sales to 4.632 million, up 6.2%. They decreased their consolidated overseas sales to 14.124 million, down 11.7%.
In FY2010, the 10 companies
expect their consolidated sales volume to grow to 19.949 million, up
6.4%. In Japan, as the government's incentive program will end, they
expect sales to shrink by approximately 300,000, but they estimate their
overseas sales will increase by 1.485 million. However, this is still
10% lower than their consolidated sales of 22.624 million in FY2007
before the financial crisis.
10 Japanese OEMs' consolidated sales volume of four-wheel vehicles |
(thousands of vehicles) |
| |
2007 JFY |
2008 JFY |
2009JFY |
2010 JFY Forecast |
Original plan |
Revised plan |
Actual |
as of November 2009 |
as of February 2010 |
Sales of four-wheel vehicles |
Toyota |
8,913 |
7,567 |
6,500 |
7,030 |
7,180 |
7,237 |
7,290 |
| Honda |
3,925 |
3,517 |
3,210 |
3,400 |
3,400 |
3,392 |
3,615 |
| Nissan |
3,698 |
3,138 |
2,807 |
3,036 |
3,201 |
3,159 |
3,415 |
| Suzuki |
2,406 |
2,306 |
2,190 |
2,259 |
2,321 |
2,349 |
2,482 |
| Mazda |
1,240 |
1,116 |
890 |
930 |
950 |
963 |
1055 |
| Mitsubishi |
1,337 |
1,011 |
836 |
836 |
823 |
805 |
1068 |
| Daihatsu |
945 |
945 |
840 |
856 |
855 |
869 |
884 |
| Fuji Heavy Ind. |
597 |
555 |
508 |
545 |
560 |
563 |
630 |
| Isuzu |
509 |
401 |
275 |
279 |
288 |
288 |
394 |
| Hino |
112 |
99 |
79 |
83 |
82 |
83 |
98 |
| total |
22,624 |
19,611 |
17,216 |
18,315 |
18,723 |
18,756 |
19,949 |
Domestic sales of four-wheel vehicles |
Toyota |
2,188 |
1,945 |
1,920 |
2,130 |
2,160 |
2,163 |
1,920 |
| Honda |
615 |
556 |
555 |
665 |
650 |
646 |
635 |
| Nissan |
684 |
576 |
576 |
576 |
588 |
599 |
570 |
| Suzuki |
673 |
665 |
655 |
633 |
622 |
622 |
610 |
| Mazda |
257 |
220 |
200 |
218 |
218 |
219 |
211 |
| Mitsubishi |
214 |
164 |
193 |
178 |
170 |
170 |
183 |
| Daihatsu |
571 |
587 |
550 |
555 |
555 |
568 |
544 |
| Fuji Heavy Ind. |
209 |
179 |
160 |
166 |
171 |
171 |
161 |
| Isuzu |
74 |
58 |
49 |
47 |
43 |
42 |
45 |
| Hino |
46 |
35 |
29 |
29 |
27 |
27 |
27 |
| total |
4,914 |
4,363 |
4,308 |
4,613 |
4,622 |
4,632 |
4,335 |
Overseas sales of four-wheel vehicles |
Toyota |
6,725 |
5,622 |
4,580 |
4,900 |
5,020 |
5,074 |
5,370 |
| Honda |
3,310 |
2,961 |
2,655 |
2,735 |
2,750 |
2,746 |
2,980 |
| Nissan |
3,013 |
2,562 |
2,231 |
2,460 |
2,613 |
2,560 |
2,840 |
| Suzuki |
1,732 |
1,641 |
1,535 |
1,626 |
1,699 |
1,727 |
1,872 |
| Mazda |
983 |
896 |
690 |
712 |
732 |
744 |
844 |
| Mitsubishi |
1,123 |
847 |
643 |
658 |
653 |
635 |
885 |
| Daihatsu |
374 |
358 |
290 |
301 |
300 |
301 |
340 |
| Fuji Heavy Ind. |
388 |
377 |
348 |
379 |
389 |
392 |
469 |
| Isuzu |
435 |
343 |
226 |
232 |
245 |
246 |
349 |
| Hino |
66 |
64 |
50 |
55 |
55 |
56 |
71 |
| total |
17,709 |
15,248 |
12,908 |
13,702 |
14,101 |
14,124 |
15,609 |
| Sources: Brief announcement
of financial results and released financial statements for 2009JFY
by 10 OEMs |
| (Note) 1. |
Mitsubishi Fuso and UD Trucks (former Nissan Diesel), subsidiaries of Daimler and Volvo, respectively, do not disclose the account settlements. |
| 2. |
Toyota and Honda use US GAAP (it also applies to following tables). |
| 3. |
"Mitsubishi" stands for Mitsubishi Motors. Planned figures are based on the companies' announcement. Empty columns mean no announcement available. (it also applies to the tables below). |
| 4. |
The figures in the 10 companies total
do not include consolidated figures of Daihatsu/Hino which are included
in the figures of Toyota (it also applies to following tables). |
| 5. |
Consolidated sales volume partially
includes the part sets shipped for production. |
| 6. |
Figures in Nissan's plan for FY2010
were calculated by adding the global sales volume fluctuations announced
by Nissan to the actual sales in FY2009. Global sales volume is
counted on a retail basis and includes a number of vehicles assembled
in the overseas affiliates applicable to the equity method using
the parts shipped for the production. (Nissan did not announce its
modification on consolidated sales volume, therefore, the modified
sales volume plan in the table above shows figures calculated by
MarkLines.) |
| 7. |
The sales volume of Suzuki counts
only Suzuki brand vehicles excluding those Suzuki supplied on OEM,
but the domestic sales include vehicles sold under the Chevrolet
brand. |
| 8. |
Sales volumes of Daihatsu and Hino are their own brand vehicles only (The remaining Daihatsu and Hino are included within Toyota's sales volume.) |
| 9. |
Figures of Isuzu in FY2007 include
results based on the 15-month accounting settled by eight overseas
consolidated subsidiaries. (Its overseas sales volume was 385,000
based on a 12-month period). |
■FY2010 sales in Asia and other regions are expected to surpass the level prior to the financial crisis
According to six manufacturers that announced their sales plan by region, they expect their sales to grow in North America, Europe, Asia and other regions except Japan, which contributes to the increase in their sales planned for FY2010. They forecast the FY2010 sales in Europe will remain at approximately 70% of the level in FY2007 before the financial crisis. The financial crisis is expected to continue to affect sales in developed countries. However, in Asia and other regions, the six OEMs expect sales volume to grow by more than 10% compared to those in FY2007.
Overseas sales volume by region |
(thousands of vehicles) |
| |
Toyota |
Honda |
Nissan |
Mazda |
Mitsubishi |
Fuji Heavy Ind. |
6 companies total |
| Japan |
2007JFY |
2,188 |
615 |
721 |
256 |
219 |
209 |
4,208 |
| 2008JFY |
1,945 |
556 |
612 |
219 |
168 |
179 |
3,679 |
| 2009JFY |
2,163 |
646 |
630 |
221 |
171 |
171 |
4,002 |
| 2010JFY Forecast |
1,920 |
635 |
600 |
210 |
183 |
161 |
3,709 |
North America |
2007JFY |
2,958 |
1,850 |
1,352 |
406 |
160 |
210 |
6,936 |
| 2008JFY |
2,212 |
1,496 |
1,133 |
347 |
119 |
207 |
5,514 |
| 2009JFY |
2,098 |
1,297 |
1,067 |
307 |
88 |
250 |
5,107 |
| 2010JFY Forecast |
2,130 |
1,480 |
1,205 |
358 |
109 |
270 |
5,552 |
| Europe |
2007JFY |
1,284 |
391 |
636 |
327 |
341 |
86 |
3,065 |
| 2008JFY |
1,062 |
350 |
530 |
322 |
272 |
78 |
2,614 |
| 2009JFY |
858 |
249 |
517 |
239 |
169 |
39 |
2,071 |
| 2010JFY Forecast |
860 |
240 |
510 |
226 |
196 |
60 |
2,092 |
Asia & Others |
2007JFY |
2,483 |
1,069 |
1,061 |
374 |
640 |
92 |
5,719 |
| 2008JFY |
2,348 |
1,115 |
1,136 |
373 |
507 |
92 |
5,571 |
| 2009JFY |
2,118 |
1,200 |
1,301 |
426 |
532 |
103 |
5,680 |
| 2010JFY Forecast |
2,380 |
1,260 |
1,485 |
476 |
633 |
138 |
6,372 |
| Total |
2007JFY |
8,913 |
3,925 |
3,770 |
1,363 |
1,360 |
597 |
19,928 |
| 2008JFY |
7,567 |
3,517 |
3,411 |
1,261 |
1,066 |
555 |
17,377 |
| 2009JFY |
7,237 |
3,392 |
3,515 |
1,193 |
960 |
563 |
16,860 |
| 2010JFY Forecast |
7,290 |
3,615 |
3,800 |
1,270 |
1121 |
630 |
17,726 |
| Sources: Released financial
statements for 2009JFY by 6 OEMs |
| (Note) 1. |
Figures for Toyota, Honda and Fuji Heavy Industries are based on consolidated sales volumes. |
| 2. |
Nissan's figures show global sales volume (that includes a number of vehicles assembled in the affiliates applicable to the equity method using shipped parts for the production). |
| 3. |
Mazda's figures show global sales volume (representing all retailed volume under Mazda brand). |
| 4. |
Mitsubishi's figures are on a retail sales basis. |
Consolidated sales amount
in FY2009 drops to 43.6 trillion JPY with decreased sales overseas
The consolidated sales amount of 10 Japanese OEMs in FY2009 was 43.6 trillion JPY, decreasing by 5.7 trillion JPY (or 11.6%) compared to FY2008, and was approximately at the 70% level of that in FY2007. In Japan, Toyota, Honda, and Fuji Heavy Industries boosted their sales due to the government's measures to encourage consumers to buy eco-friendly vehicles; the 10 companies' consolidated sales were 11.9 trillion JPY, remaining at the same level as FY2008. However, in the overseas markets, the companies (excluding Daihatsu) decreased their sales amount, total consolidated sales were down by 5.7 trillion JPY (or 15.3%) to 31.7 trillion JPY.
In each company's plan for
FY2010, sales are expected to grow with the exception of Daihatsu. The
consolidated sales amount is estimated to increase by 2.6 trillion JPY
(or 5.9%) to 46.2 trillion JPY.
10 Japanese OEMs' consolidated sales amount |
(100 millions of Yen) |
| |
2007 JFY |
2008 JFY |
2009JFY |
2010 JFY Forecast |
Original plan |
Revised plan |
Actual |
as of November 2009 |
as of February 2010 |
| Sales |
Toyota |
262,892 |
205,296 |
165,000 |
180,000 |
185,000 |
189,509 |
192,000 |
| Honda |
120,028 |
100,112 |
83,700 |
84,500 |
85,300 |
85,791 |
93,400 |
| Nissan |
108,242 |
84,370 |
69,500 |
70,000 |
74,000 |
75,173 |
82,000 |
| Suzuki |
35,024 |
30,049 |
23,000 |
23,000 |
23,000 |
24,691 |
25,000 |
| Mazda |
34,758 |
25,359 |
20,300 |
21,300 |
21,500 |
21,639 |
22,700 |
| Mitsubishi |
26,821 |
19,736 |
15,000 |
15,000 |
15,000 |
14,456 |
19,000 |
| Daihatsu |
17,026 |
16,314 |
14,000 |
14,500 |
15,000 |
15,747 |
14,500 |
| Fuji Heavy Ind. |
15,723 |
14,458 |
13,200 |
13,600 |
14,100 |
14,287 |
14,700 |
| Isuzu |
19,248 |
14,247 |
10,800 |
10,200 |
10,600 |
10,809 |
13,400 |
| Hino |
13,686 |
10,695 |
9,000 |
9,500 |
9,800 |
10,235 |
11,200 |
| total |
622,738 |
493,626 |
400,500 |
417,600 |
428,500 |
436,355 |
462,200 |
Domestic Sales |
Toyota |
61,362 |
54,218 |
|
|
|
57,291 |
|
| Honda |
15,858 |
14,465 |
|
|
|
15,772 |
|
| Nissan |
21,878 |
20,383 |
|
|
|
18,032 |
|
| Suzuki |
9,814 |
9,656 |
|
|
|
9,526 |
|
| Mazda |
8,801 |
6,203 |
|
|
|
5,749 |
|
| Mitsubishi |
4,885 |
3,984 |
|
|
|
3,685 |
|
| Daihatsu |
11,771 |
11,913 |
|
|
|
11,296 |
|
| Fuji Heavy Ind. |
5,440 |
5,075 |
|
|
|
5,208 |
|
| Isuzu |
6,547 |
5,338 |
|
|
|
4,060 |
|
| Hino |
9,246 |
6,944 |
|
|
|
6,754 |
|
| total |
134,586 |
119,322 |
|
|
|
119,323 |
|
Overseas Sales |
Toyota |
201,530 |
151,078 |
|
|
|
132,218 |
|
| Honda |
104,171 |
85,647 |
|
|
|
70,019 |
|
| Nissan |
86,364 |
63,987 |
|
|
|
57,141 |
|
| Suzuki |
25,210 |
20,393 |
|
|
|
15,165 |
|
| Mazda |
25,957 |
19,156 |
|
|
|
15,890 |
|
| Mitsubishi |
21,936 |
15,752 |
|
|
|
10,771 |
|
| Daihatsu |
5,255 |
4,401 |
|
|
|
4,452 |
|
| Fuji Heavy Ind. |
10,284 |
9,383 |
|
|
|
9,079 |
|
| Isuzu |
12,701 |
8,909 |
|
|
|
6,749 |
|
| Hino |
4,440 |
3,751 |
|
|
|
3,481 |
|
| total |
488,153 |
374,304 |
|
|
|
317,032 |
|
Sources: Brief announcement of financial results
and released financial statements for 2009JFY by 10 OEMs
(Note) Domestic or overseas sales amount shows the sales figures by region where the external customers are located.
In FY2009, all 10 companies
register operating profit and in FY2010 also forecast ordinary profit
and net profit
In FY2009, all 10 companies
registered operating profit and their consolidated profit was 964 billion
JPY. They also expect to post an operating profit for FY2010, expecting
a total of 1.3 trillion JPY (4.6 trillion JPY in FY2007).
In FY2009, all companies except
Hino posted ordinary profit, while all but Mazda, Fuji Heavy Industries,
and Hino reported net profit. In FY2010, all manufacturers expect to
achieve ordinary profit and net profit.
Consolidated operating/ordinary/net profit of 10 Japanese OEMs |
(100 millions of Yen) |
| |
2007 JFY |
2008 JFY |
2009JFY |
2010 JFY Forecast |
Original plan |
Revised plan |
Actual |
as of November 2009 |
as of February 2010 |
Operating profit |
Toyota |
22,704 |
(4,610) |
(8,500) |
(3,500) |
(200) |
1,475 |
2,800 |
| Honda |
9,531 |
1,896 |
100 |
1,900 |
3,200 |
3,637 |
4,000 |
| Nissan |
7,908 |
(1,379) |
(1,000) |
1,200 |
2,900 |
3,116 |
3,500 |
| Suzuki |
1,494 |
769 |
100 |
400 |
500 |
794 |
800 |
| Mazda |
1,621 |
(284) |
(500) |
(120) |
50 |
95 |
300 |
| Mitsubishi |
1,086 |
39 |
300 |
300 |
300 |
139 |
450 |
| Daihatsu |
652 |
382 |
170 |
260 |
310 |
407 |
430 |
| Fuji Heavy Ind. |
457 |
(58) |
(350) |
10 |
140 |
274 |
430 |
| Isuzu |
1,096 |
217 |
(180) |
(180) |
(50) |
110 |
450 |
| Hino |
459 |
(194) |
(150) |
(120) |
(90) |
11 |
250 |
| total |
45,897 |
(3,410) |
(10,030) |
10 |
6,840 |
9,640 |
12,730 |
Ordinary profit |
Toyota |
24,372 |
(5,604) |
(8,500) |
(3,000) |
900 |
2,914 |
3,300 |
| Honda |
8,958 |
1,617 |
100 |
1,700 |
3,000 |
3,361 |
4,100 |
| Nissan |
7,664 |
(1,727) |
(2,000) |
200 |
1,800 |
2,077 |
3,150 |
| Suzuki |
1,569 |
797 |
200 |
500 |
600 |
938 |
950 |
| Mazda |
1,485 |
(187) |
(600) |
(160) |
0 |
46 |
290 |
| Mitsubishi |
857 |
(149) |
150 |
150 |
150 |
130 |
300 |
| Daihatsu |
666 |
395 |
160 |
270 |
320 |
438 |
450 |
| Fuji Heavy Ind. |
454 |
(46) |
(400) |
(50) |
100 |
224 |
380 |
| Isuzu |
1,223 |
152 |
(260) |
(230) |
(70) |
114 |
420 |
| Hino |
410 |
(304) |
(220) |
(190) |
(145) |
(19) |
210 |
| total |
46,583 |
(5,147) |
(11,310) |
(890) |
6,480 |
9,804 |
12,890 |
| Net profit |
Toyota |
17,179 |
(4,369) |
(5,500) |
(2,000) |
800 |
2,094 |
3,100 |
| Honda |
6,000 |
1,370 |
400 |
1,550 |
2,650 |
2,684 |
3,400 |
| Nissan |
4,823 |
(2,337) |
(1,700) |
(400) |
350 |
424 |
1,500 |
| Suzuki |
803 |
274 |
50 |
150 |
160 |
289 |
300 |
| Mazda |
918 |
(715) |
(500) |
(170) |
(90) |
(65) |
50 |
| Mitsubishi |
347 |
(549) |
50 |
50 |
50 |
48 |
150 |
| Daihatsu |
349 |
221 |
80 |
130 |
150 |
212 |
210 |
| Fuji Heavy Ind. |
185 |
(699) |
(550) |
(250) |
(250) |
(165) |
230 |
| Isuzu |
760 |
(269) |
(200) |
(200) |
(50) |
84 |
200 |
| Hino |
222 |
(618) |
(240) |
(245) |
(225) |
(30) |
110 |
| total |
31,015 |
(7,294) |
(7,950) |
(1,270) |
3,620 |
5,393 |
8,930 |
| FOREX Rates: Yen to US Dollar |
114 |
101 |
94 |
|
|
93 |
90 |
| FOREX Rates: Yen to Euro |
162 |
144 |
122 |
|
|
131 |
121 |
| Sources: Brief announcement
of financial results and released financial statements for 2009JFY
by 10 OEMs |
| (Note) 1. |
Ordinary profits/losses of Toyota and Honda who use US GAAP represent current earnings before-tax. |
| 2. |
Exchange rate figures are mean averages of account settling rates announced by manufacturers (when plural rates are announced, rate for sales was used). |
Reduction of overhead cost, and R&D cost increased profit by 2.2 trillion JPY in FY2009
In FY2009, all 10 companies
registered operating profit and their consolidated profit improved by
1.3 trillion JPY. Sales fluctuation and the FX fluctuation decreased
the operating profit by 877.4 billion JPY and 847.9 billion JPY, respectively,
whereas cost reduction and reduction of overhead cost and R&D cost increased
it by 1.0 trillion JPY and 1.2 trillion JPY, respectively.
In FY2010, the 10 OEMs expect
that their consolidated operating profit improve by only 308.9 billion
JPY. Although the increase in sales will boost the profit by 566.4 billion
JPY, the profit from cost reduction will shrink to 245.0 billion JPY
due to the rising price of materials and other factors such as an increase
in investment cost and R & D cost are expected to reduce the profit.
Operating profit/loss factors of Japanese OEMs |
(100 millions of Yen) |
| |
2007 JFY |
2008 JFY |
2009JFY |
2010 JFY Forecast |
Original plan |
Revised plan |
Actual |
as of Nov. 2009 |
as of Feb. 2010 |
| Toyota |
Operating profit Operating profit fluctuation |
22,704 317 |
(4,610) (27,314) |
(8,500) (3,890) |
(3,500) 1,110 |
(200) 4,410 |
1,475 6,085 |
2,800 1,325 |
| Business/sales |
2,900 |
(14,800) |
(8,000) |
(5,000) |
(2,300) |
(3,700) |
(500) |
| Cost reduction |
1,200 |
0 |
3,400 |
4,400 |
4,700 |
5,200 |
1,300 |
| Loan business |
|
|
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
| Exchange rate fluctuation |
0 |
(7,600) |
(4,500) |
(4,200) |
(4,300) |
(3,200) |
(800) |
Overhead cost thereof: R&D cost thereof: Equipment related cost thereof: Labor cost thereof: Others |
(3,302) (681) (997) (602) (1,022) |
(4,791) 548 (904) 1,088 (5,523) |
4,600 |
5,100 |
5,500 |
4,700 1,787 378 627 1,908 |
1,600 |
| Others |
(481) |
(122) |
610 |
810 |
810 |
385 |
(275) |
| Honda |
Operating profit Operating profit fluctuation |
9,531 1,012 |
1,896 (7,634) |
100 (1,796) |
1,900 3 |
3,200 1,303 |
3,637 1,741 |
4,000 362 |
| Sales/composition fluctuation |
1,700 |
(2,477) |
(3,348) |
(2,417) |
(2,138) |
(2,465) |
1,989 |
| Exchange rate fluctuation |
376 |
(2,695) |
(1,930) |
(2,090) |
(1,800) |
(1,675) |
(450) |
| Cost reduction effect |
115 |
(1,825) |
(390) |
170 |
410 |
674 |
60 |
| R&D cost |
(361) |
247 |
482 |
631 |
981 |
998 |
(367) |
| Sales/administration cost |
(818) |
(883) |
3,390 |
3,710 |
3,850 |
4,209 |
(870) |
Nissan (Note 3) |
Operating profit Operating profit fluctuation |
7,908 353 |
(1,379) (9,287) |
(1,000) 379 |
1,200 2,579 |
2,900 4,279 |
3,116 4,495 |
3,500 384 |
| Exchange rate fluctuation |
(162) |
(2,230) |
(1,700) |
(2,000) |
(1,850) |
(1,625) |
(300) |
| Sales/composition fluctuation |
750 |
(5,252) |
(2,000) |
(800) |
200 |
269 |
2,700 |
| Purchasing cost etc. |
882 |
(1,342) |
1,500 |
1,800 |
2,200 |
2,154 |
600 |
| Leasing loss reserve |
|
(918) |
|
1,300 |
1,400 |
1,417 |
(400) |
| Others |
(1,114) |
455 |
2,579 |
2,279 |
2,329 |
2,280 |
(2,216) |
| Suzuki |
Operating profit Operating profit fluctuation |
1,494 165 |
769 (725) |
100 (669) |
400 (369) |
500 (269) |
794 25 |
800 6 |
| Sales/composition fluctuation etc. |
408 |
(1,422) |
(919) |
(1,669) |
(1,509) |
(696) |
(34) |
| Exchange rate fluctuation |
225 |
(707) |
(810) |
(610) |
(520) |
(469) |
(240) |
| Cost reduction |
284 |
201 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
172 |
170 |
| Depreciation |
(117) |
204 |
60 |
110 |
110 |
(6) |
120 |
| R&D cost |
(166) |
(63) |
100 |
200 |
250 |
62 |
(10) |
| Overhead expenses |
(469) |
1,062 |
700 |
1,400 |
1,200 |
962 |
|
| Mazda |
Operating profit Operating profit fluctuation |
1,621 36 |
(284) (1,905) |
(500) (216) |
(120) 164 |
50 334 |
95 379 |
300 205 |
| Sales/composition fluctuation |
80 |
(865) |
(890) |
(700) |
(630) |
(606) |
290 |
| Exchange rate fluctuation |
234 |
(1,020) |
(960) |
(850) |
(780) |
(765) |
(40) |
| Product competitiveness improvement cost |
(133) |
(190) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cost reduction |
158 |
440 |
680 |
680 |
680 |
680 |
0 |
| Raw material market conditions |
|
(440) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sales cost |
(42) |
65 |
290 |
260 |
250 |
227 |
(60) |
| Others |
(261) |
105 |
664 |
774 |
814 |
843 |
15 |
Mitsubishi Motors |
Operating profit Operating profit fluctuation |
1,086 684 |
39 (1,047) |
300 261 |
300 261 |
300 261 |
139 100 |
450 311 |
| Sales/composition fluctuation |
543 |
(720) |
(570) |
(780) |
(800) |
(856) |
540 |
| Exchange rate fluctuation |
146 |
(761) |
(710) |
(440) |
(420) |
(418) |
(100) |
| Cost reduction etc. |
154 |
365 |
680 |
680 |
680 |
544 |
200 |
| Raw material market conditions |
|
(317) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Others |
|
335 |
571 |
561 |
561 |
578 |
(249) |
| Sales cost |
(64) |
174 |
290 |
240 |
240 |
252 |
(80) |
| US sales loan business |
(95) |
(123) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Daihatsu |
Operating profit Operating profit fluctuation |
652 109 |
381 (271) |
170 (211) |
300 (81) |
300 (81) |
407 26 |
430 33 |
| Sales/composition fluctuation |
190 |
113 |
(420) |
|
|
|
|
| Exchange rate fluctuation |
39 |
(80) |
(120) |
|
|
|
|
| Cost reduction |
106 |
105 |
80 |
|
|
|
|
| Overhead expenses |
(227) |
(408) |
249 |
|
|
|
|
Fuji Heavy Ind. |
Operating profit Operating profit fluctuation |
457 (22) |
(58) (515) |
(350) (292) |
10 68 |
140 198 |
274 332 |
430 156 |
| Sales/composition fluctuation |
(8) |
3 |
(411) |
(85) |
9 |
87 |
209 |
| Exchange rate fluctuation |
10 |
(435) |
(271) |
(297) |
(304) |
(304) |
(127) |
| Cost reduction etc. |
70 |
(32) |
218 |
242 |
258 |
260 |
130 |
| R&D cost |
(13) |
92 |
(2) |
28 |
38 |
57 |
(88) |
| Overhead cost |
(81) |
(143) |
174 |
180 |
197 |
232 |
32 |
| Isuzu |
Operating profit Operating profit fluctuation |
1,096 26 |
217 (879) |
(180) (397) |
(180) (397) |
(50) (267) |
110 (107) |
450 340 |
| Sales/composition fluctuation |
(113) |
(800) |
(840) |
(950) |
(860) |
(807) |
470 |
| Exchange rate fluctuation |
34 |
(156) |
(60) |
(40) |
(30) |
(23) |
0 |
| Economic fluctuation |
(82) |
(273) |
190 |
180 |
180 |
181 |
(120) |
| Rationalization |
172 |
190 |
100 |
120 |
130 |
130 |
110 |
| Cost reduction etc. |
|
|
213 |
293 |
313 |
412 |
(120) |
| Profitability improvement |
76 |
344 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Equipment/R&D related |
(137) |
(108) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Change in affiliates' accounting term |
76 |
(76) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hino |
Operating profit Operating profit fluctuation |
459 92 |
(194) (653) |
(150) 44 |
(120) 74 |
(90) 104 |
11 205 |
250 239 |
| Sales related |
82 |
(330) |
(150) |
210 |
231 |
231 |
60 |
| Management environmental change |
(36) |
(366) |
(140) |
(95) |
(91) |
(70) |
(105) |
| Cost improvement |
190 |
163 |
190 |
190 |
190 |
199 |
190 |
| Cost fluctuation etc. |
(144) |
(120) |
144 |
160 |
160 |
190 |
(46) |
| Sales (volume) fluctuation |
|
|
|
(391) |
(386) |
(345) |
140 |
10 companies total |
Operating profit Operating profit fluctuation |
45,897 2,571 |
(3,410) (49,306) |
(10,030) (6,620) |
10 3,419 |
6,840 10,249 |
9,640 13,050 |
12,730 3,089 |
| Sales fluctuation |
6,260 |
(26,333) |
(16,978) |
(12,401) |
(8,028) |
(8,774) |
5,664 |
| Exchange rate fluctuation |
863 |
(15,604) |
(10,941) |
(10,527) |
(10,004) |
(8,479) |
(2,057) |
| Cost reduction etc. |
3,111 |
(2,416) |
6,601 |
8,585 |
9,571 |
10,226 |
2,450 |
| Overhead cost/R&D cost, etc. |
(951) |
443 |
8,824 |
11,049 |
11,706 |
12,199 |
(143) |
| Sources: |
Brief announcement of financial results and released financial statements for 2009JFY by 10 auto manufacturers. |
| (Note) 1. |
Toyota's Others of 38.5 billion JPY in FY2009 includes valuation profit of interest-rate swap agreement etc. of 64.5 billion JPY and overseas affiliates' exchange rate loss on operating profit of 26.0 billion JPY. |
| 2. |
Nissan's purchasing cost etc. includes raw material and energy cost. |
| 3. |
Sales/composition fluctuation of Suzuki
includes raw material cost fluctuation (28.1 billion JPY in FY2009). |
| 4. |
Others of Mitsubishi Motors in the result of FY2009 mainly includes indirect labor cost of 32.8 billion JPY, impairment of US assets of 7.0 billion JPY, and development cost of 18.0 billion JPY. |
| 5. |
Cost reduction etc. of Fuji Heavy Industries includes the effect of raw material price increase. |
10 OEMs plan to increase
investment by 400 billion JPY and R & D by 150 billion JPY in FY2010
Consolidated capital investment of 10 Japanese OEMs in FY2009 was 1.5 trillion JPY, decreasing by 1.3 trillion JPY from FY2008. R&D cost was cut by around 403.2 billion JPY to 1.9 trillion JPY.
In FY2010, each maker will increase investment to a total of approximately 1.9 trillion JPY, which is approximately 1 trillion JPY lower that the level before the financial crisis. R&D costs are expected to increase by approximately 150 billion JPY to 2.1 trillion JPY.
Consolidated capital investments, depreciations and R&D costs by 10 Japanese OEMs |
| (100 millions of Yen) |
| |
2007 JFY |
2008 JFY |
2009JFY |
2010 JFY Forecast |
Original plan |
Revised plan |
Actual |
as of November 2009 |
as of February 2010 |
Investment in facilities and equipment |
Toyota |
14,802 |
13,025 |
8,300 |
7,600 |
6,900 |
5,790 |
7,400 |
| Honda |
6,540 |
5,991 |
3,900 |
3,800 |
3,700 |
3,297 |
3,800 |
| Nissan |
4,289 |
3,836 |
3,500 |
3,250 |
3,000 |
2,736 |
3,600 |
| Suzuki |
2,436 |
2,162 |
1,850 |
1,850 |
1,850 |
1,312 |
1,700 |
| Mazda |
755 |
818 |
300 |
300 |
300 |
298 |
600 |
| Mitsubishi |
567 |
719 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
471 |
760 |
| Daihatsu |
1,117 |
767 |
550 |
400 |
400 |
367 |
540 |
| Fuji Heavy Ind. |
563 |
580 |
590 |
560 |
560 |
561 |
560 |
| Isuzu |
506 |
667 |
340 |
320 |
320 |
257 |
370 |
| Hino |
437 |
584 |
330 |
320 |
|
285 |
330 |
| total |
30,458 |
27,798 |
19,280 |
18,180 |
17,130 |
14,722 |
18,790 |
| Depreciation |
Toyota |
10,424 |
10,721 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
10,320 |
9,000 |
| Honda |
4,173 |
4,082 |
3,800 |
3,800 |
3,800 |
3,666 |
3,500 |
| Nissan |
3,709 |
4,212 |
4,000 |
3,900 |
3,850 |
3,633 |
3,800 |
| Suzuki |
1,616 |
1,412 |
1,350 |
1,300 |
1,300 |
1,418 |
1,300 |
| Mazda |
665 |
752 |
780 |
780 |
770 |
764 |
730 |
| Mitsubishi |
719 |
790 |
760 |
760 |
760 |
690 |
700 |
| Daihatsu |
665 |
837 |
760 |
730 |
730 |
729 |
710 |
| Fuji Heavy Ind. |
655 |
651 |
590 |
560 |
560 |
571 |
520 |
| Isuzu |
415 |
396 |
410 |
400 |
400 |
395 |
380 |
| Hino |
442 |
475 |
504 |
490 |
|
452 |
450 |
| total |
22,376 |
23,016 |
21,690 |
21,500 |
21,440 |
21,457 |
19,930 |
R&D expenditure |
Toyota |
9,588 |
9,040 |
8,200 |
8,000 |
7,600 |
7,253 |
7,600 |
| Honda |
5,879 |
5,631 |
5,150 |
5,000 |
4,650 |
4,633 |
5,000 |
| Nissan |
4,575 |
4,555 |
4,000 |
3,950 |
3,950 |
3,855 |
4,300 |
| Suzuki |
1,087 |
1,150 |
1,050 |
950 |
900 |
1,088 |
1,100 |
| Mazda |
1,144 |
960 |
920 |
920 |
890 |
852 |
1000 |
| Mitsubishi |
776 |
640 |
550 |
550 |
550 |
444 |
560 |
| Daihatsu |
442 |
442 |
470 |
450 |
450 |
437 |
410 |
| Fuji Heavy Ind. |
520 |
428 |
430 |
400 |
390 |
372 |
460 |
| Isuzu |
603 |
677 |
580 |
580 |
590 |
552 |
600 |
| Hino |
395 |
409 |
377 |
377 |
|
381 |
404 |
| total |
24,172 |
23,081 |
20,880 |
20,350 |
19,520 |
19,049 |
20,620 |
| Sources: Brief announcement of financial results and released financial statements for 2009JFY by 10 OEMs. |
| (Note) |
Nissan's capital investment and depreciation include finance lease related items starting from FY2008 (not included up to FY2007) The investment in FY2007 on the same basis as FY2008 was 516.4 billion JPY. |
|